Self-regulated learning: A study on the checklist peer-evaluation method of evaluating Chinese composition of Hong Kong junior secondary school students

Yee Wan Kwan, On Wai Lee

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: The focus of this study lay with whether the checklist peer-evaluation method can enhance students' self-regulated performance and interest in self-evaluation of writing and thus whether the method is suitable for application in junior secondary in Hong Kong. Aims: This study investigated the effects of the checklist peer-evaluation method of evaluating Chinese composition on S1 students' self-regulated performance in terms of writing quality and their attitudes towards self-evaluation. Method & Sample: A sample total of 37 students from one S1 class of an aided secondary school in Hong Kong was used. Results: The results indicated that both the teachers and students agreed that significant improvement was made in three aspects: "content", "handwriting/ wrong words/ punctuation", and "total score". According to the student interviews, the students showed a favorable attitude towards this method and perceived it was beneficial to their writing quality. Conclusion: Providing the opportunities of self-evaluating Chinese composition to students would be helpful to develop their self-regulated disposition and ability and promote their learning motivation and confidence.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)53-60
    Number of pages8
    JournalNew Horizons in Education
    Volume60
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - May 2012

    User-Defined Keywords

    • Checklist peer-evaluation method
    • Self-evaluating Chinese composition
    • Self-regulated learning

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Self-regulated learning: A study on the checklist peer-evaluation method of evaluating Chinese composition of Hong Kong junior secondary school students'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this