TY - JOUR
T1 - Science literacy or value predisposition? A meta-analysis of factors predicting public perceptions of benefits, risks, and acceptance of nuclear energy
AU - Ho, Shirley S.
AU - Leong, Alisius D.
AU - Looi, Jiemin
AU - Chen, Liang
AU - Pang, Natalie
AU - Tandoc Jr, Edson
N1 - This material is based on research supported by the Singapore National Research Foundation under NPRP Award No. NRF2014NPR-NPRP001-004. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Singapore National Research Foundation.
PY - 2019/4
Y1 - 2019/4
N2 - Nuclear energy is widely regarded as a controversial technology that polarizes public opinion. Guided by the scientific literacy and cognitive miser models, this study systematically identified and examined the magnitude of the effects of 19 predictors on public perceptions of benefits, risks, and acceptance of nuclear energy. We meta-analysed 34 empirical studies, representing a total sample of 32,938 participants and 129 independent correlations. The findings demonstrated that trust substantially affected public perception of benefits regarding nuclear energy. Sex, education, public perception of benefits regarding nuclear energy, trust, and public deliberation substantially influenced public perception of risks regarding nuclear energy. Moreover, sex, education, public perceptions of benefits, risks and costs regarding nuclear energy, knowledge, and trust substantially affected public acceptance of nuclear energy. Country of sample and time period of data collection moderated public perceptions of benefits, risks, and acceptance of nuclear energy. Implications for future research are discussed.
AB - Nuclear energy is widely regarded as a controversial technology that polarizes public opinion. Guided by the scientific literacy and cognitive miser models, this study systematically identified and examined the magnitude of the effects of 19 predictors on public perceptions of benefits, risks, and acceptance of nuclear energy. We meta-analysed 34 empirical studies, representing a total sample of 32,938 participants and 129 independent correlations. The findings demonstrated that trust substantially affected public perception of benefits regarding nuclear energy. Sex, education, public perception of benefits regarding nuclear energy, trust, and public deliberation substantially influenced public perception of risks regarding nuclear energy. Moreover, sex, education, public perceptions of benefits, risks and costs regarding nuclear energy, knowledge, and trust substantially affected public acceptance of nuclear energy. Country of sample and time period of data collection moderated public perceptions of benefits, risks, and acceptance of nuclear energy. Implications for future research are discussed.
KW - Nuclear energy
KW - meta-analysis
KW - risk perception
KW - benefit perception
KW - science knowledge
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85040969100&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&sid=57d8ac850315bb23385462d96805f1b0&sot=b&sdt=b&s=DOI%2810.1080%2F17524032.2017.1394891%29&sl=34&sessionSearchId=57d8ac850315bb23385462d96805f1b0
U2 - 10.1080/17524032.2017.1394891
DO - 10.1080/17524032.2017.1394891
M3 - Journal article
SN - 1752-4032
VL - 13
SP - 457
EP - 471
JO - Environmental Communication
JF - Environmental Communication
IS - 4
ER -
