Abstract
Mereological nihilism is the thesis that composition never occurs. Some philosophers have thought that science gives us compelling evidence against nihilism. In this article I respond to this concern. An initial challenge for nihilism stems from the fact that composition is such a ubiquitous feature of scientific theories. In response I motivate a restricted form of scientific anti-realism with respect to those components of scientific theories which make reference to composition. A second scientifically based worry for nihilism is that certain specific scientific phenomena (quantum entanglement, natural selection) might require ineliminable quantification over composite objects. I address these concerns, and argue that there seem to be nihilist-friendly construals of the scientific phenomena in question.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 657–678 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Synthese |
| Volume | 195 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 5 Oct 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2018 |
User-Defined Keywords
- Composition
- Special composition question
- Mereological nihilism
- Compositional nihilism
- Quantum entanglement
- Natural selection