Science and the special composition question

Andrew Brenner*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

    12 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Mereological nihilism is the thesis that composition never occurs. Some philosophers have thought that science gives us compelling evidence against nihilism. In this article I respond to this concern. An initial challenge for nihilism stems from the fact that composition is such a ubiquitous feature of scientific theories. In response I motivate a restricted form of scientific anti-realism with respect to those components of scientific theories which make reference to composition. A second scientifically based worry for nihilism is that certain specific scientific phenomena (quantum entanglement, natural selection) might require ineliminable quantification over composite objects. I address these concerns, and argue that there seem to be nihilist-friendly construals of the scientific phenomena in question.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)657–678
    Number of pages22
    JournalSynthese
    Volume195
    Issue number2
    Early online date5 Oct 2016
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2018

    User-Defined Keywords

    • Composition
    • Special composition question
    • Mereological nihilism
    • Compositional nihilism
    • Quantum entanglement
    • Natural selection

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Science and the special composition question'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this