Abstract
William Sanday's proposal concerning the doctrine of the incarnation was widely criticized after it was published. Nevertheless, in recent decades a number of scholars have defended psychological models of the incarnation which are similar to his. However, they have not discussed the problems highlighted by Sanday's critics. I evaluate these problems and argue that they are not as insurmountable as Sanday's critics thought them to be, as his model can be modified to deal with them adequately. I conclude that further work along Sanday's line of thought is to be welcomed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 187-197 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Journal of Theological Studies |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2012 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Sanday’s Christology Revisited'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver