Abstract
This paper examines the concept of “righteous warfare” as employed in three early Chinese texts associated with Daoist philosophy: The excavated manuscript Huangdi sijing (The Yellow Emperor’s Four Classics), the Wenzi(Book of Master Wen), and the Huainanzi(Book of the Master of Huainan). At first glance, their promulgation of offensive righteous warfare seems at odds both with the Laozi’s (Book of the Old Master) condemnations of war and its rejection of “righteousness.” However, a closer analysis suggests that, despite differences in terminology and emphasis, there is a common thread in how polit-ical treatises belonging to the different branches of Daoist thought, as well as different stages in its development, treated warfare and its ethical dimensions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-30 |
| Number of pages | 30 |
| Journal | Journal of Daoist Studies |
| Volume | 13 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 30 Jan 2020 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Righteous war in early daoist classics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver