Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine the profitability of return‐based investment strategies in the New Zealand stock market; 16 such strategies are examined for the period from January 1995 to December 2004.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper shows that, at the end of each month of the sample period, every security is ranked in ascending order using their past J‐month formation period cumulative return (J=3, 6, 9 and 12). Then these securities are allocated to three groups; group 1 represents the loser portfolio, while group 3 represents the winner portfolio. Finally, equally weighted average returns of winner and loser portfolios are calculated over the next K‐month holding period (K=3, 6, 9, and 12). The statistical significance of the returns earned from buying winners and shorting losers is tested in order to determine the profitability of proposed strategies.
Findings
The findings in this paper show that a strong momentum effect, rather than a reversal effect, is present in this market. For example, the strategy, which is based on a six‐month portfolio formation period and a six‐month holding period, generates a monthly return of 1.14 per cent. These strategies are most profitable when they are based on formation and holding periods of three‐to‐six months. Further analyses reveal that the profits generated by such investment strategies cannot be explained by either the small firm effect or the January effect.
Originality/value
The main implication of this paper shows that buying past winners and selling past losers is profitable in the short to medium run in New Zealand.
The purpose of this paper is to examine the profitability of return‐based investment strategies in the New Zealand stock market; 16 such strategies are examined for the period from January 1995 to December 2004.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper shows that, at the end of each month of the sample period, every security is ranked in ascending order using their past J‐month formation period cumulative return (J=3, 6, 9 and 12). Then these securities are allocated to three groups; group 1 represents the loser portfolio, while group 3 represents the winner portfolio. Finally, equally weighted average returns of winner and loser portfolios are calculated over the next K‐month holding period (K=3, 6, 9, and 12). The statistical significance of the returns earned from buying winners and shorting losers is tested in order to determine the profitability of proposed strategies.
Findings
The findings in this paper show that a strong momentum effect, rather than a reversal effect, is present in this market. For example, the strategy, which is based on a six‐month portfolio formation period and a six‐month holding period, generates a monthly return of 1.14 per cent. These strategies are most profitable when they are based on formation and holding periods of three‐to‐six months. Further analyses reveal that the profits generated by such investment strategies cannot be explained by either the small firm effect or the January effect.
Originality/value
The main implication of this paper shows that buying past winners and selling past losers is profitable in the short to medium run in New Zealand.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 108-124 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Pacific Accounting Review |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 22 May 2007 |
User-Defined Keywords
- Momentum
- New Zealand
- Stock markets