Responsible innovation for decent nonliberal peoples: a dilemma?

Pak Hang Wong*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is hard to disagree with the idea of responsible innovation (henceforth, RI), as it enables policy-makers, scientists, technology developers, and the public to better understand and respond to the social, ethical, and policy challenges raised by new and emerging technologies. RI has gained prominence in the policy agenda in Europe and the United States over the last few years. And, along with its rising importance in policy-making, there is also a burgeoning research literature on the topic. Given the historical context from which RI emerges, it should not be surprising that the current discourse on RI is predominantly based on liberal democratic values. Yet, the bias towards liberal democratic values will inevitably limit the discussion of RI, especially in the cases where liberal democratic values are not taken for granted. As such, there is an urgent need to return to the normative foundation of RI, and to explore the notion of ‘responsible innovation’ from nonliberal democratic perspectives. Against this background, this paper seeks to demonstrate the problematic consequences of RI solely grounded on or justified by liberal democratic values. This paper will cast the argument in the form of a dilemma to be labelled as The Decent Nonliberal Peoples’ Dilemma and use it to illustrate the problems of the Western bias.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)154-168
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Responsible Innovation
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 May 2016

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Strategy and Management
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

User-Defined Keywords

  • decent nonliberal peoples
  • dilemma
  • liberal democracy
  • Responsible innovation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Responsible innovation for decent nonliberal peoples: a dilemma?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this