TY - JOUR
T1 - Responsible innovation for decent nonliberal peoples
T2 - a dilemma?
AU - Wong, Pak Hang
N1 - Acknowledgement:
An early version of this paper was presented at the Climate Engineering Conference 2014 with the title ‘Responsible Innovation and the Danger of Technological Imperialism: A Case of Climate Engineering’. The author wants to thank the audiences for insightful comments. The author would also like to thank Steve Rayner, Tom Wang and the colleagues at the Department of Social Science, Hang Seng Management College, for extensive discussions on the ideas in the paper. Thanks also go to the anonymous reviewers for their suggestions to improve the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
PY - 2016/5/3
Y1 - 2016/5/3
N2 - It is hard to disagree with the idea of responsible innovation (henceforth, RI), as it enables policy-makers, scientists, technology developers, and the public to better understand and respond to the social, ethical, and policy challenges raised by new and emerging technologies. RI has gained prominence in the policy agenda in Europe and the United States over the last few years. And, along with its rising importance in policy-making, there is also a burgeoning research literature on the topic. Given the historical context from which RI emerges, it should not be surprising that the current discourse on RI is predominantly based on liberal democratic values. Yet, the bias towards liberal democratic values will inevitably limit the discussion of RI, especially in the cases where liberal democratic values are not taken for granted. As such, there is an urgent need to return to the normative foundation of RI, and to explore the notion of ‘responsible innovation’ from nonliberal democratic perspectives. Against this background, this paper seeks to demonstrate the problematic consequences of RI solely grounded on or justified by liberal democratic values. This paper will cast the argument in the form of a dilemma to be labelled as The Decent Nonliberal Peoples’ Dilemma and use it to illustrate the problems of the Western bias.
AB - It is hard to disagree with the idea of responsible innovation (henceforth, RI), as it enables policy-makers, scientists, technology developers, and the public to better understand and respond to the social, ethical, and policy challenges raised by new and emerging technologies. RI has gained prominence in the policy agenda in Europe and the United States over the last few years. And, along with its rising importance in policy-making, there is also a burgeoning research literature on the topic. Given the historical context from which RI emerges, it should not be surprising that the current discourse on RI is predominantly based on liberal democratic values. Yet, the bias towards liberal democratic values will inevitably limit the discussion of RI, especially in the cases where liberal democratic values are not taken for granted. As such, there is an urgent need to return to the normative foundation of RI, and to explore the notion of ‘responsible innovation’ from nonliberal democratic perspectives. Against this background, this paper seeks to demonstrate the problematic consequences of RI solely grounded on or justified by liberal democratic values. This paper will cast the argument in the form of a dilemma to be labelled as The Decent Nonliberal Peoples’ Dilemma and use it to illustrate the problems of the Western bias.
KW - decent nonliberal peoples
KW - dilemma
KW - liberal democracy
KW - Responsible innovation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032670460&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/23299460.2016.1216709
DO - 10.1080/23299460.2016.1216709
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85032670460
SN - 2329-9460
VL - 3
SP - 154
EP - 168
JO - Journal of Responsible Innovation
JF - Journal of Responsible Innovation
IS - 2
ER -