Report card grades on physical activity for children and adolescents from 18 Asian countries: Patterns, trends, gaps, and future recommendations

Eun Young Lee*, An Chi Shih, Maia Collins, Yeong Bae Kim, Patrick Abi Nader, Jasmin Bhawra, Tarun Reddy Katapally, Chiaki Tanaka, Pairoj Saonuam, Piyawat Katewongsa, Dyah Anantalia Widyastari, Wendy Y. Huang, Stephen H. Wong, Asaduzzaman Khan, Narayan Subedi, Susan Paudel, Chen Kang Chang, Ching Lin Wu, Justin Y. Jeon, Yeon Soo KimTom Loney, Falk Müller-Riemenschneider, Bozhi Chen, Jonathan Y. Cagas, Jyh Eiin Wong, Mohd Razif Shahril, Agus Mahendra, Mark S. Tremblay

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: Physical inactivity is a persistent and worsening population health concern in Asia. Led by the Active Healthy Kids Global Alliance, Global Matrix (GM) initiative provides an opportunity to explore how regional and cultural differences across 18 Asian countries relate to physical activity (PA) participation among children and adolescents.

    Objectives: To synthesize evidence from the GM2.0 to GM4.0 (2016–2022) in Asian countries.

    Methods: Report Card grades on behavioral/individual and sources of influence indicators were reported from 18 Asian countries. Letter grades were converted into numerical values for quantitative analyses. Based on this, cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses were conducted to investigate patterns and trends. Qualitative evidence synthesis was performed based on Report Card grades and published papers to identify gaps and suggest future recommendations.

    Results: In total, 18 countries provided grades for at least one round of GM, 12 countries provided grades for at least two rounds, and seven countries provided grades for all three GMs. Of possible grades, 72.8%, 69.2%, and 76.9% of the grades were assigned from GM 2.0 to GM 4.0, respectively. In terms of the Report Card grades, there was a slight decrease in behavioral/individual indicators from "D+" in GM 2.0 to "D-" in GM 3.0 but this reverted to "D" in GM 4.0. For the sources of influence, a "C" grade was given in all three rounds of GM. Longitudinal observation of seven Asian countries that provided grades in all three rounds of GM revealed that grades are generally stable for all indicators with some country-specific fluctuations. In future GM initiatives and research, considerations should be made to provide more accurate and rich data and to better understand contextual challenges in evaluating certain indicators such as Active Transportation, Active Play, and Physical Fitness in particular. Further, macro level factors such as socioeconomic/cultural disparities and gender-specific barriers, ideology, or climate change should also be proactively considered in future research as these factors are becoming increasingly relevant to indicators of GM and United Nation's Sustainable Development Goals.

    Conclusions: Participation from Asian countries in GM has increased over the years, which demonstrates the region's enthusiasm, capacity, and support for global PA promotion efforts. The efforts to promote a physically active lifestyle among children and adolescents should be a collective interest and priority of the Asia region based on the gaps identified in this paper.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)34-44
    Number of pages11
    JournalJournal of Exercise Science and Fitness
    Volume21
    Issue number1
    Early online date29 Oct 2022
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2023

    Scopus Subject Areas

    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
    • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

    User-Defined Keywords

    • Asian population
    • Global matrix
    • Global surveillance
    • Physical activity
    • Sedentary behavior

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Report card grades on physical activity for children and adolescents from 18 Asian countries: Patterns, trends, gaps, and future recommendations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this