TY - JOUR
T1 - Removing acesulfame with the peroxone process
T2 - Transformation products, pathways and toxicity
AU - Chow, Chi Hang
AU - LEUNG, Kelvin S Y
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (HKBU 12303017) for their financial support. K. S. –Y. Leung is grateful for funding support from the H. Chow is supported by a postgraduate studentship offered by the University Grants Committee. Inter-institutional Collaborative Research Scheme ( RC-ICRS/16-17/02B ), Inter-disciplinary Research Matching Scheme ( RC-IRMS/16-17/01A ) and Partner State Key Laboratory of Environmental and Biological Analysis ( SKLP-1415-P006 , SKLP-1617-P03 ), Hong Kong Baptist University. The authors acknowledge the University Research Facility in Life Sciences of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University for generous access to the UHPLC-QTOF-MS instrumentation. Kelvin S. –Y. Leung acknowledges the Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen ( JCYJ20170817173243420 ) for funding support. C.
PY - 2019/4
Y1 - 2019/4
N2 - Emerging contaminants (ECs) are receiving considerable attention because of their widespread occurrence, persistence and potential threat to the environment, wildlife and humans. Acesulfame (ACE), an extensively used artificial sweetener, is the most worrisome example of ECs. The photolysis/photocatalysis, chlorination and/or permanganate oxidation of ACE produces transformation products (TPs) that are more persistent and toxic than precursors. Thus, an alternative treatment method to treat ACE is required; oxidation by the peroxone process could be that method and was systematically investigated, as reported here. During the peroxone process, ACE degradation followed pseudo-first-order kinetics, with a rate that was significantly higher than after conventional ozonation. The hydroxyl radical was the major reactive species. Amount of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) used, pH and type of water matrix showed significant influence on ACE degradation. Fifteen TPs in ultrapure water extracts, including four newly reported compounds, were identified and characterized by high resolution mass spectrometry (HR-MS) based on accurate mass measurements and MS/MS fragmentation. The reduced toxicity compared to other reported treatments of ACE was likely due to different transformation pathways and TPs generated. The peroxone process therefore appears to be one viable choice for safe removal of ACE.
AB - Emerging contaminants (ECs) are receiving considerable attention because of their widespread occurrence, persistence and potential threat to the environment, wildlife and humans. Acesulfame (ACE), an extensively used artificial sweetener, is the most worrisome example of ECs. The photolysis/photocatalysis, chlorination and/or permanganate oxidation of ACE produces transformation products (TPs) that are more persistent and toxic than precursors. Thus, an alternative treatment method to treat ACE is required; oxidation by the peroxone process could be that method and was systematically investigated, as reported here. During the peroxone process, ACE degradation followed pseudo-first-order kinetics, with a rate that was significantly higher than after conventional ozonation. The hydroxyl radical was the major reactive species. Amount of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) used, pH and type of water matrix showed significant influence on ACE degradation. Fifteen TPs in ultrapure water extracts, including four newly reported compounds, were identified and characterized by high resolution mass spectrometry (HR-MS) based on accurate mass measurements and MS/MS fragmentation. The reduced toxicity compared to other reported treatments of ACE was likely due to different transformation pathways and TPs generated. The peroxone process therefore appears to be one viable choice for safe removal of ACE.
KW - Acesulfame
KW - Ecotoxicity
KW - Ozonation
KW - Peroxone
KW - Transformation products
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060958295&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.082
DO - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.082
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 30665093
AN - SCOPUS:85060958295
SN - 0045-6535
VL - 221
SP - 647
EP - 655
JO - Chemosphere
JF - Chemosphere
ER -