Public Reason Naturalism

James Dominic Rooney*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

    Abstract

    I will argue that the natural law theory of morality, when extended into a political theory of justice, results in a picture of political justice much like that of public reason liberalism. However, natural law political theory, I argue, need not entail a natural law theory of morality. While facts about what societies ought to do supervene upon facts about what is good for human beings, there are distinct goods involved and distinct reasons for action. Rather, considerations taken from the common good as guiding public policy results in a two-layer approach to public reasonability, resembling features of both consensus and convergence accounts of public reason. Consequently, the differences between natural law and classical public reason liberalism are significant but are not as significant as might have otherwise appeared. In fact, natural law political theory might be a more consistent development of the idea of a public reason than those of classical liberalism.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)195-210
    Number of pages16
    JournalAmerican Journal of Jurisprudence
    Volume68
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023

    Cite this