TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychometric Evaluation of a Physical Literacy Assessment for Older Adults: Rasch Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis
AU - Ou, Kai-Ling
AU - Huang, Wendy Yajun
AU - Chien, Chi-Wen
AU - Carl, Johannes
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2025/6/9
Y1 - 2025/6/9
N2 - Addressing the lack of high-quality physical literacy instruments for older adults, the goal of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of the Physical Literacy Assessment for Older Adults (PLAOA), which was previously developed through a Delphi study. A sample of 380 older adults completed the Senior Fitness Test, self-reported questionnaires, and accelerometer (ActiGraph) measurements. After removal of misfitting items, the initial PLAOA contained 37 items. Construct validity was supported through (1) Rasch analyses confirming the unidimensionality of the subdomains (0.1%–14.9% unexplained variance, eigenvalue < 2); (2) a strong correlation with the Senior Perceived Physical Literacy Instrument (r = 0.81, p < .001); (3) satisfactory confirmatory factor analyses (χ2/df = 1.911, CFI = 0.940, TLI = 0.935, RMSEA = 0.049, SRMR = 0.052); and (4) good internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha of 0.80. Additionally, good test-retest reliability was demonstrated. This study has provided preliminary evidence of the validity and reliability of the PLAOA to better understand physical literacy and active aging in adults.
AB - Addressing the lack of high-quality physical literacy instruments for older adults, the goal of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of the Physical Literacy Assessment for Older Adults (PLAOA), which was previously developed through a Delphi study. A sample of 380 older adults completed the Senior Fitness Test, self-reported questionnaires, and accelerometer (ActiGraph) measurements. After removal of misfitting items, the initial PLAOA contained 37 items. Construct validity was supported through (1) Rasch analyses confirming the unidimensionality of the subdomains (0.1%–14.9% unexplained variance, eigenvalue < 2); (2) a strong correlation with the Senior Perceived Physical Literacy Instrument (r = 0.81, p < .001); (3) satisfactory confirmatory factor analyses (χ2/df = 1.911, CFI = 0.940, TLI = 0.935, RMSEA = 0.049, SRMR = 0.052); and (4) good internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha of 0.80. Additionally, good test-retest reliability was demonstrated. This study has provided preliminary evidence of the validity and reliability of the PLAOA to better understand physical literacy and active aging in adults.
KW - Physical literacy
KW - Rasch measurement
KW - reliability
KW - validity claims
KW - validity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105007751389&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/1091367x.2025.2509256
DO - 10.1080/1091367x.2025.2509256
M3 - Journal article
SN - 1091-367X
SP - 1
EP - 14
JO - Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science
JF - Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science
ER -