Proattitudinal versus counterattitudinal messages: Message discrepancy, reactance, and the boomerang effect

Xinyan Zhao*, Edward L. Fink

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A boomerang effect involves the movement of a message recipient's belief, attitude, or behavior in a direction contrary to the advocated position in the message. There has been limited scholarly attention to the mechanism of belief boomerang. To better understand boomerang effects, we tested the effect of message discrepancy on belief boomerang and the mechanism underlying such an effect with a between-subjects factorial study (N = 458). Our results revealed that a counterattitudinal message resulted in belief boomerang, whereas a proattitudinal message resulted in persuasion. The relationship between discrepancy and belief boomerang was accounted for by a motivational (i.e., reactance) process. The results suggest the significance of examining the boomerang effect as an outcome distinct from a failure to persuade.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)286-305
Number of pages20
JournalCommunication Monographs
Volume88
Issue number3
Early online date2 Sept 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2021

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics

User-Defined Keywords

  • Belief boomerang
  • experiment
  • message discrepancy
  • reactance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Proattitudinal versus counterattitudinal messages: Message discrepancy, reactance, and the boomerang effect'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this