Abstract
Contemporary debates about the metaphysics of material composition occur within the framework set by the Special Composition Question, as proposed famously by Peter van Inwagen. This question asks what one must do, what conditions must be satisfied, for some things to compose one object as proper parts. Hylomorphism is a theory that has regained prominence in contemporary metaphysics, explaining the unity of composite material objects by appealing to a special metaphysical part of those objects: structure or form. My book defends hylomorphism as a meaningful and significant answer to questions about the composition of material objects. Specifically, I propose that, if it is false that substances can have other substances as parts, hylomorphism can be shown not only to be a plausible theory but that all consistent accounts of restricted composition can be shown to be hylomorphist. After introducing and summarizing the trajectory of the book, I turn to reviewing and responding to objections from my interlocutors for this symposium.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 122 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Asian Journal of Philosophy |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 12 Nov 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2025 |
User-Defined Keywords
- Confucianism
- Hylomorphism
- Material composition
- Parthood
- Structure