Précis of material objects in confucian and Aristotelian metaphysics

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Contemporary debates about the metaphysics of material composition occur within the framework set by the Special Composition Question, as proposed famously by Peter van Inwagen. This question asks what one must do, what conditions must be satisfied, for some things to compose one object as proper parts. Hylomorphism is a theory that has regained prominence in contemporary metaphysics, explaining the unity of composite material objects by appealing to a special metaphysical part of those objects: structure or form. My book defends hylomorphism as a meaningful and significant answer to questions about the composition of material objects. Specifically, I propose that, if it is false that substances can have other substances as parts, hylomorphism can be shown not only to be a plausible theory but that all consistent accounts of restricted composition can be shown to be hylomorphist. After introducing and summarizing the trajectory of the book, I turn to reviewing and responding to objections from my interlocutors for this symposium.
Original languageEnglish
Article number122
Number of pages5
JournalAsian Journal of Philosophy
Volume4
Issue number2
Early online date12 Nov 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2025

User-Defined Keywords

  • Confucianism
  • Hylomorphism
  • Material composition
  • Parthood
  • Structure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Précis of material objects in confucian and Aristotelian metaphysics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this