Abstract
Based on publications addressing post-secularity in international contexts, this article identifies four basic interpretive positions manifest within our post-secular age: resistant post-secular secularists, strategic post-secular secularists, engaged post-secular intellectuals, and engaged post-secular religious intellectuals. Subsequently, an article addressing governance and religious studies in mainland China published by Zhuo Xinping in 2010 is assessed, indicating how Zhuo serves as an engaged post-secular intellectual position, charging Chinese Marxist officials to adopt a strategic post-secular secularist position. Finally, it is shown how in a major volume on philosophical studies in China published in 2008 by Li Jingyuan a strategic post-secularist position is manifest.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 121-138 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Journal of Chinese Philosophy |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2012 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Post-secularity within contemporary Chinese philosophical contexts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver