TY - JOUR
T1 - Photochemistry of ozone pollution in autumn in Pearl River Estuary, South China
AU - Liu, Xufei
AU - Wang, Nan
AU - Lyu, Xiaopu
AU - Zeren, Yangzong
AU - Jiang, Fei
AU - Wang, Xinming
AU - Zou, Shichun
AU - Ling, Zhenhao
AU - Guo, Hai
N1 - Funding Information:
To obtain the VOCs data at QA and TC sites in pattern 1, which were only collected on one day, i.e., September 26, at TC, a chemical transport model, i.e., the Weather Research and Forecasting-Community Multiscale Air Quality (WRF-CMAQ) model, was utilized to simulate VOCs in this pattern. The VOCs levels were extracted from the WRF-CMAQ modeling and calibrated using observed data. The offline meteorological field (CMAQ v5.0.2) was supported by WRF v3.6.1. Two-nested domain was applied with the same resolution of 36 km (outer domain) and 12 km (inner domain) as Lyu et al. (2019) did. The 2016-based Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China (MEIC), developed by Tsinghua University, was used to provide anthropogenic emissions of air pollutants (grid resolution: 0.25° × 0.25°). The biogenic emissions were calculated using the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN, version 2.04) (Guenther et al., 2006), with its good performance validated by previous studies (Wang et al., 2015, 2016, 2019b). The detailed configurations could be found in Lyu et al. (2019).
This study was supported by the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region via Theme-Based Research Scheme (Project T24-504/l7-N) and General Research Fund (PolyU 152052/14E and PolyU 152052/16E), the Strategic Focus Area scheme of the Research Institute for Sustainable Urban Development at the Hong Kong Polytechnic University (1-BBW9), and the FCE Postdoctoral Fellowship Scheme (ZVMN). The authors would like to thank the Hong Kong Environmental Protection Department for providing air quality monitoring data at Tung Chung site (https://cd.epic.epd.gov.hk/EPICDI/air/station/).
Funding Information:
This study was supported by the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region via Theme-Based Research Scheme (Project T24-504/l7-N ) and General Research Fund ( PolyU 152052/14E and PolyU 152052/16E ), the Strategic Focus Area scheme of the Research Institute for Sustainable Urban Development at the Hong Kong Polytechnic University ( 1-BBW9 ), and the FCE Postdoctoral Fellowship Scheme (ZVMN). The authors would like to thank the Hong Kong Environmental Protection Department for providing air quality monitoring data at Tung Chung site ( https://cd.epic.epd.gov.hk/EPICDI/air/station/ ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/2/1
Y1 - 2021/2/1
N2 - To explore the photochemical O3 pollution over the Pearl River Estuary (PRE), intensive measurements of O3 and its precursors, including trace gases and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), were simultaneously conducted at a suburban site on the east bank of PRE (Tung Chung, TC) in Hong Kong and a rural site on the west bank (Qi'ao, QA) in Zhuhai, Guangdong in autumn 2016. Throughout the sampling period, 3 days with high O3 levels (maximum hourly O3 > 100 ppbv) were captured at both sites (pattern 1) and 13 days with O3 episodes occurred only at QA (pattern 2). It was found that O3 formation at TC was VOC-limited in both patterns because of the large local NOx emissions. However, the O3 formation at QA was co-limited by VOCs and NOx in pattern 1, but VOC-limited in pattern 2. In both patterns, isoprene, formaldehyde, xylenes and trimethylbenzenes were the top 4 VOCs that modulated local O3 formation at QA, while they were isoprene, formaldehyde, xylenes and toluene at TC. In pattern 1, the net O3 production rate at QA (13.1 ± 1.6 ppbv h−1) was high, and comparable (p = 0.40) to that at TC (12.1 ± 1.5 ppbv h−1), so was the hydroxyl radical (i.e., OH), implying high atmospheric oxidative capacity over PRE. In contrast, the net O3 production rate was significantly higher (p < 0.05) at QA (16.3 ± 0.4 ppbv h−1) than that at TC (4.7 ± 0.2 ppbv h−1) in pattern 2, and the OH concentration and cycling rate were also higher, indicating much stronger photochemical reactions at QA. These findings enhanced our understanding of O3 photochemistry in the Pearl River estuary, which could be extended to other estuaries.
AB - To explore the photochemical O3 pollution over the Pearl River Estuary (PRE), intensive measurements of O3 and its precursors, including trace gases and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), were simultaneously conducted at a suburban site on the east bank of PRE (Tung Chung, TC) in Hong Kong and a rural site on the west bank (Qi'ao, QA) in Zhuhai, Guangdong in autumn 2016. Throughout the sampling period, 3 days with high O3 levels (maximum hourly O3 > 100 ppbv) were captured at both sites (pattern 1) and 13 days with O3 episodes occurred only at QA (pattern 2). It was found that O3 formation at TC was VOC-limited in both patterns because of the large local NOx emissions. However, the O3 formation at QA was co-limited by VOCs and NOx in pattern 1, but VOC-limited in pattern 2. In both patterns, isoprene, formaldehyde, xylenes and trimethylbenzenes were the top 4 VOCs that modulated local O3 formation at QA, while they were isoprene, formaldehyde, xylenes and toluene at TC. In pattern 1, the net O3 production rate at QA (13.1 ± 1.6 ppbv h−1) was high, and comparable (p = 0.40) to that at TC (12.1 ± 1.5 ppbv h−1), so was the hydroxyl radical (i.e., OH), implying high atmospheric oxidative capacity over PRE. In contrast, the net O3 production rate was significantly higher (p < 0.05) at QA (16.3 ± 0.4 ppbv h−1) than that at TC (4.7 ± 0.2 ppbv h−1) in pattern 2, and the OH concentration and cycling rate were also higher, indicating much stronger photochemical reactions at QA. These findings enhanced our understanding of O3 photochemistry in the Pearl River estuary, which could be extended to other estuaries.
KW - Ozone pollution
KW - VOCs
KW - Ozone photochemistry
KW - PBM-MCM
KW - Pearl River Estuary
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090232016&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141812
DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141812
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 32906035
AN - SCOPUS:85090232016
SN - 0048-9697
VL - 754
JO - Science of the Total Environment
JF - Science of the Total Environment
M1 - 141812
ER -