Abstract
International cooperation has played a major role in climate governance. With a particular focus on China, this study develops a comparative framework to understand three pathways to international cooperation on climate change: multilateralism, bilateralism and transnationalism. Drawing on cooperation theory, we compare the three pathways in terms of their leaders, organisations, bargaining process, agreement, and enforcement efforts, and analyse their comparative strengths and limitations. We suggest that, given the ever-increasing difficulties and uncertainty experienced in climate multilateralism, the government should pay more attention to developing climate bilateralism and transnationalism in order to leverage the benefits of international cooperation on climate governance.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 417-434 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Journal of Chinese Governance |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 8 Feb 2020 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
User-Defined Keywords
- bilateralism
- Climate governance
- international cooperation
- multilateralism
- transnationalism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Pathways to international cooperation on climate governance in China: a comparative analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver