TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimal Planning of Air Quality-Monitoring Sites for Better Depiction of PM2.5Pollution across China
AU - Zhou, Chenhong
AU - Gao, Meng
AU - Li, Jianjun
AU - Bai, Kaixu
AU - Tang, Xiao
AU - Lu, Xiao
AU - Liu, Cheng
AU - Wang, Zifa
AU - Guo, Yike
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by grants from Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (project no. HKBU22201820 and HKBU12202021) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42005084).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Chemical Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/7/20
Y1 - 2022/7/20
N2 - A myriad of studies have attempted to use ground-level observations to obtain gap-free spatiotemporal variations of PM2.5, in support of air quality management and impact studies. Statistical methods (machine learning, etc.) or numerical methods by combining chemical transport modeling and observations with data assimilation techniques have been typically applied, yet the significance of site placement has not been well recognized. In this study, we apply five proper orthogonal decomposition (POD)-based sensor placement algorithms to identify optimal site locations and systematically evaluate their reconstruction ability. We demonstrate that the QR pivot is relatively more reliable in deciding optimal monitoring site locations. When the number of planned sites (sensors) is limited, using a lower number of modes would yield lower estimation errors. However, the dimension of POD modes has little impact on reconstruction quality when sufficient sensors are available. The locations of sites guided by the QR pivot algorithm are mainly located in regions where PM2.5 pollution is severe. We compare reconstructed PM2.5 pollution based on QR pivot-guided sites and existing China National Environmental Monitoring Center (CNEMC) sites and find that the QR pivot-guided sites are superior to existing sites with respect to reconstruction accuracy. The current planning of monitoring stations is likely to miss sources of pollution in less-populated regions, while our QR pivot-guided sites are planned based on the severity of PM2.5 pollution. This planning methodology has additional potentials in chemical data assimilation studies as duplicate information from current CNEMC-concentrated stations is not likely to boost performance.
AB - A myriad of studies have attempted to use ground-level observations to obtain gap-free spatiotemporal variations of PM2.5, in support of air quality management and impact studies. Statistical methods (machine learning, etc.) or numerical methods by combining chemical transport modeling and observations with data assimilation techniques have been typically applied, yet the significance of site placement has not been well recognized. In this study, we apply five proper orthogonal decomposition (POD)-based sensor placement algorithms to identify optimal site locations and systematically evaluate their reconstruction ability. We demonstrate that the QR pivot is relatively more reliable in deciding optimal monitoring site locations. When the number of planned sites (sensors) is limited, using a lower number of modes would yield lower estimation errors. However, the dimension of POD modes has little impact on reconstruction quality when sufficient sensors are available. The locations of sites guided by the QR pivot algorithm are mainly located in regions where PM2.5 pollution is severe. We compare reconstructed PM2.5 pollution based on QR pivot-guided sites and existing China National Environmental Monitoring Center (CNEMC) sites and find that the QR pivot-guided sites are superior to existing sites with respect to reconstruction accuracy. The current planning of monitoring stations is likely to miss sources of pollution in less-populated regions, while our QR pivot-guided sites are planned based on the severity of PM2.5 pollution. This planning methodology has additional potentials in chemical data assimilation studies as duplicate information from current CNEMC-concentrated stations is not likely to boost performance.
KW - aerosol data assimilation
KW - ground-level PMestimation
KW - PMpollution
KW - sensor placement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130830121&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acsenvironau.1c00051
DO - 10.1021/acsenvironau.1c00051
M3 - Journal article
SN - 2694-2518
VL - 2
SP - 314
EP - 323
JO - ACS Environmental Au
JF - ACS Environmental Au
IS - 4
ER -