On the ground estimation of vegetation cover in Australian rangelands

Q. Zhou; M. Robson; P. Pilesjo

doi:10.1080/014311698215261

On the ground estimation of vegetation cover in Australian rangelands

Q. Zhou^*, M. Robson, P. Pilesjo

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › peer-review

91 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A number of field techniques were assessed on their reliability for estimating vegetation cover in Australian rangelands. The field sampling was undertaken using visual estimation, line intercepts, a crown cover model, and images acquired from a digital camera. The results from these methods were compared and analysed. The data obtained from these differing methods agree with each other in relative rather than absolute terms. This suggests that the methods can provide a reasonable basis for qualitative remote sensing studies, but are not suitable for quantitative investigations.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1815-1820
Number of pages	6
Journal	International Journal of Remote Sensing
Volume	19
Issue number	9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/014311698215261
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 1998

Scopus Subject Areas

Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

Access to Document

10.1080/014311698215261

Cite this

@article{0b76b18a43d44d96b622bebe49bba3c7,

title = "On the ground estimation of vegetation cover in Australian rangelands",

abstract = "A number of field techniques were assessed on their reliability for estimating vegetation cover in Australian rangelands. The field sampling was undertaken using visual estimation, line intercepts, a crown cover model, and images acquired from a digital camera. The results from these methods were compared and analysed. The data obtained from these differing methods agree with each other in relative rather than absolute terms. This suggests that the methods can provide a reasonable basis for qualitative remote sensing studies, but are not suitable for quantitative investigations.",

author = "Q. Zhou and M. Robson and P. Pilesjo",

note = "Funding Information: The project was funded by Australian Research Council. The authors would like tothank{\textregistered} eldteammembersAllanEvans,RichardJessop,BenMacDonald,Tim Loan and John Cu€ . Thanks are also given to Dr R. B. Owen of Hong Kong Baptist University for his comments and help in editing the text. The constructive criticisms and comments by the anonymous referees are also acknowledged.",

year = "1998",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1080/014311698215261",

language = "English",

volume = "19",

pages = "1815--1820",

journal = "International Journal of Remote Sensing",

issn = "0143-1161",

publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the ground estimation of vegetation cover in Australian rangelands

AU - Zhou, Q.

AU - Robson, M.

AU - Pilesjo, P.

N1 - Funding Information: The project was funded by Australian Research Council. The authors would like tothank® eldteammembersAllanEvans,RichardJessop,BenMacDonald,Tim Loan and John Cu€ . Thanks are also given to Dr R. B. Owen of Hong Kong Baptist University for his comments and help in editing the text. The constructive criticisms and comments by the anonymous referees are also acknowledged.

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - A number of field techniques were assessed on their reliability for estimating vegetation cover in Australian rangelands. The field sampling was undertaken using visual estimation, line intercepts, a crown cover model, and images acquired from a digital camera. The results from these methods were compared and analysed. The data obtained from these differing methods agree with each other in relative rather than absolute terms. This suggests that the methods can provide a reasonable basis for qualitative remote sensing studies, but are not suitable for quantitative investigations.

AB - A number of field techniques were assessed on their reliability for estimating vegetation cover in Australian rangelands. The field sampling was undertaken using visual estimation, line intercepts, a crown cover model, and images acquired from a digital camera. The results from these methods were compared and analysed. The data obtained from these differing methods agree with each other in relative rather than absolute terms. This suggests that the methods can provide a reasonable basis for qualitative remote sensing studies, but are not suitable for quantitative investigations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032100835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/014311698215261

DO - 10.1080/014311698215261

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:0032100835

SN - 0143-1161

VL - 19

SP - 1815

EP - 1820

JO - International Journal of Remote Sensing

JF - International Journal of Remote Sensing

IS - 9

ER -

On the ground estimation of vegetation cover in Australian rangelands

Abstract

Scopus Subject Areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this