On the Divine Preconscious Model of the Incarnation and concrete-nature Christology: A reply to James Arcadi

Andrew Ter Ern Loke*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a recent article published in NZSTh, James Arcadi offers an assessment of the Divine Preconscious Model of the Incarnation. Arcadi objects that, because I aver that this model runs on a concrete-nature account of natures, I am not able to maintain the full humanity of Christ. I argue that Arcadi's objections are not compelling, and while I appreciate his intention to offer constructive feedback, I explain that his suggestions that I embrace a form of neo-Apollinarianism by adopting the abstract-nature perspective of natures are unmotivated and disadvantageous.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)26-33
Number of pages8
JournalNeue Zeitschrift fur Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie
Volume59
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Mar 2017

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Religious studies
  • Philosophy

User-Defined Keywords

  • abstract-nature
  • Apollinarianism
  • Coherence of the Incarnation
  • concretenature
  • Divine Preconscious Model

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On the Divine Preconscious Model of the Incarnation and concrete-nature Christology: A reply to James Arcadi'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this