Abstract
In a recent article published in NZSTh, James Arcadi offers an assessment of the Divine Preconscious Model of the Incarnation. Arcadi objects that, because I aver that this model runs on a concrete-nature account of natures, I am not able to maintain the full humanity of Christ. I argue that Arcadi's objections are not compelling, and while I appreciate his intention to offer constructive feedback, I explain that his suggestions that I embrace a form of neo-Apollinarianism by adopting the abstract-nature perspective of natures are unmotivated and disadvantageous.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 26-33 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Neue Zeitschrift fur Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 29 Mar 2017 |
Scopus Subject Areas
- Religious studies
- Philosophy
User-Defined Keywords
- abstract-nature
- Apollinarianism
- Coherence of the Incarnation
- concretenature
- Divine Preconscious Model