On subjectivity and objectivity in the Mengzi—or realism with a Confucian face

Kevin J. Turner*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This essay argues that the philosophy of the Mengzi is not an idealism or naturalism which makes morality something innate. These interpretations are limited by Cartesian presuppositions of objectivity and subjectivity, which were not a part of the Mengzi’s philosophical repertoire. This essay rehearses the problem of subjectivity and objectivity in Western philosophy. It then argues that no such dichotomy informed the Mengzi; instead, it maintains that minds and their worlds are mutually entailing and constituting. It explores the relationship between the concepts of heart-mind, human nature, and tian, arguing that heart-mind is the emergence of human nature which is the internalized interpretive framework of an external Confucian morality referred to as tian. It argues that humans are situated within historical traditions that provide their world horizons. There is no world beyond the Confucian world and no mind beyond the Confucian mind: the Mengzi is a realism with a Confucian face.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)351-362
    Number of pages12
    JournalAsian Philosophy
    Volume29
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2 Oct 2019

    Scopus Subject Areas

    • Religious studies
    • Philosophy

    User-Defined Keywords

    • heart-mind
    • human nature
    • Mengzi
    • realism
    • tian

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'On subjectivity and objectivity in the Mengzi—or realism with a Confucian face'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this