On Linear Existential Graphs

Francesco Bellucci, Xinwen Liu, Ahti Veikko Pietarinen

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)


    Peirce's linear versions of the language of his Existential Graphs (EGs), presented in 1902, are examined. Differences between linear and non-linear languages are explained by permutational invariance and type- vs. occurrence-referentiality: Standard EGs are permutationally invariant with respect to linear EGs, while the Beta part of the system, which corresponds to first-order quantificational theory with identity, is occurrence-referential. However, occurrence-referentiality of Beta graphs constitutes a defect of expressivity: Since the meaning of a quantifier is inextricably connected to the meaning of the sign of identity, certain complex assertions cannot be expressed in the language of Beta graphs without a new extension of its standard notation.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)261-296
    Number of pages36
    JournalLogique et Analyse
    Publication statusPublished - May 2020

    Scopus Subject Areas

    • Philosophy

    User-Defined Keywords

    • Existential Graphs
    • Linear Notations
    • Quantification and Identity
    • Type vs. Occurrence-Referentiality


    Dive into the research topics of 'On Linear Existential Graphs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this