On God and the Beginning of the Universe: An Evaluation of Recent Discussions

Andrew Ter Ern Loke*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Philosophical analysis is of vital importance for addressing the controversies in science and theology. This article evaluates the analyses concerning God and the beginning of the universe offered by a number of philosophers. It is shown that, while Linford is correct in that establishing that physical reality has a finite past is not sufficient for establishing that physical reality had a beginning, the objections which Linford, Schmid, Oberle, and Wielenberg have offered against the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God can be rebutted. The examination of the objections and rebuttals demonstrates how a more careful philosophical analyses of the issues concerning the argument against infinite causal regress, personal identity, timelessness, the definition and reducibility of time, and the causal principle can contribute to the interaction between science and theology.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number290
    Number of pages14
    JournalReligions
    Volume14
    Issue number3
    Early online date21 Feb 2023
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2023

    Scopus Subject Areas

    • Religious studies

    User-Defined Keywords

    • beginning of universe
    • timelessness
    • cosmological argument
    • causal regress
    • personal identity
    • causal principle

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'On God and the Beginning of the Universe: An Evaluation of Recent Discussions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this