More Scottish than Welsh? Understanding the 2011 Devolved Elections in Scotland and Wales

Roger Scully*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)


In line with the prevailing methodological nationalism of electoral studies, sub-state regional elections are often assumed to be shaped primarily by state-wide political dynamics. But such assumptions make it difficult to understand why, as occurred in Scotland and Wales in May 2011, simultaneous sub-state elections might produce sharply contrasting outcomes. Drawing on original data from the Scottish and Welsh Election Studies, this paper compares voting behaviour in these two elections. We test two main hypotheses: that the election outcomes differed because of the greater influence of UK-wide political dynamics in Wales than in Scotland; and that the differing election outcomes reflected simply the differing attractiveness of the main parties in the two nations. We find substantial support for the latter hypothesis, but also some support for the former: vote choice in the 2011 devolved elections was more distinctively Scottish than it was Welsh. The conclusion considers the implications of our findings for understanding devolved politics in Scotland and Wales, and sub-state elections in general.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)591-612
Number of pages22
JournalRegional and Federal Studies
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2013

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Political Science and International Relations

User-Defined Keywords

  • devolution
  • Elections
  • Scotland
  • Wales


Dive into the research topics of 'More Scottish than Welsh? Understanding the 2011 Devolved Elections in Scotland and Wales'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this