Abstract
The Court of Appeal in the recent decision of Google Inc v Judith Vidal Hall1 1 [2015] E.M.L.R. 15, [2015] E.W.C.A. Civ 311. has made a number of remarkable rulings in the area of privacy. An important aspect of this decision is that it clarified the legal foundation in which an action for unauthorised disclosure of private information is found. However, the decision itself is not without flaws. This paper seeks to analyse potential problems with the action being classified as a tort as well as the scope of misuse of private information being a form of privacy protection.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 87-97 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Computer Law and Security Review |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 12 Dec 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
User-Defined Keywords
- Google v. Judith Vidal-Hall
- Tort
- Misuse of information
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Misuse of private information as a tort: The implications of Google v Judith Vidal-Hall'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver