TY - JOUR
T1 - Mistakes and How to Avoid Mistakes in Using Intercoder Reliability Indices
AU - Feng, Guangchao Charles
N1 - Publisher copyright:
© 2014 Hogrefe Publishing
PY - 2015/1
Y1 - 2015/1
N2 - Although intercoder reliability has been considered crucial to the validity of a content study, the choice among them has been controversial. This study analyzed all the content studies published in the two major communication journals that reported intercoder reliability, aiming to find how scholars conduct the intercoder reliability test. The results revealed that some intercoder reliability indices were misused persistently concerning the levels of measurement, the number of coders, and the means of reporting reliability over the past 30 years. Implications of misuse, disuse, and abuse were discussed, and suggestions regarding proper choice of indices in various situations were made at last.
AB - Although intercoder reliability has been considered crucial to the validity of a content study, the choice among them has been controversial. This study analyzed all the content studies published in the two major communication journals that reported intercoder reliability, aiming to find how scholars conduct the intercoder reliability test. The results revealed that some intercoder reliability indices were misused persistently concerning the levels of measurement, the number of coders, and the means of reporting reliability over the past 30 years. Implications of misuse, disuse, and abuse were discussed, and suggestions regarding proper choice of indices in various situations were made at last.
KW - intercoder reliability
KW - content analysis
KW - misuse
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84924625276&partnerID=MN8TOARS
U2 - 10.1027/1614-2241/a000086
DO - 10.1027/1614-2241/a000086
M3 - Journal article
SN - 1614-1881
VL - 11
SP - 13
EP - 22
JO - Methodology
JF - Methodology
IS - 1
ER -