Abstract
Psychological reactance is one of the underlying mechanisms of message effects on persuasion outcomes. We conducted meta-analyses across 28 articles, comprising 33 studies and 146 effect sizes (2005–2024), to examine (a) message effects on psychological reactance and (b) the influence of psychological reactance on persuasion outcomes. Results showed that high freedom-threatening language increased anger (k = 28, r = .21), negative cognitions (k = 25, r = .17), and psychological reactance (k = 53, r = .20) compared to low freedom-threatening language. These effects were moderated by behavior repetitiveness and communication modality. However, gain vs. loss framing showed no significant differences in anger (k = 6, r = –.03), negative cognitions (k = 6, r = –.01), or psychological reactance (k = 12, r = –.02). Both anger (r = –.23, k = 42) and negative cognitions (r = –.18, k = 39) were negatively associated with persuasion outcomes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 38–52 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Human Communication Research |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 30 Jun 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
User-Defined Keywords
- message effects
- meta-analysis
- multilevel meta-analysis
- psychological reactance
- random-effects model
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Message effects on psychological reactance: meta-analyses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver