Abstract
The contemporary sociology of knowledge treats meso-level institutions
of intellectual production as its primary investigative focus but seldom
studies global intellectual inequalities. Decolonial and postcolonial
studies of knowledge focus on global intellectual inequalities, but they
seldom examine meso-level institutions. This study’s research objective
is to help bridge the research gap that results from these two fields’
disconnection: meso-level processes of intellectual imperialism. It does
so by analysing the disruption of intellectual lineage formation in
non-Western contexts and theorising this disruption as a processual
aspect of intellectual imperialism. It coins the shorthand term
‘juniority effects’ to describe these relational processes. It
investigates data on the careers of the first two cohorts of prominent
thinkers in Japan between the 1860s and the 1910s and in China between
the 1880s and the 1920s. The data sources include a wide variety of
primary historical materials and secondary studies. Based on
illustrating how these thinkers experienced and confronted reputational
disruptions, it illustrates that juniority effects existed and seriously
obstructed local intellectual lineages.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2610-2628 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Third World Quarterly |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue number | 18 |
| Early online date | 15 Nov 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 12 Dec 2025 |
User-Defined Keywords
- decolonial studies
- Intellectual imperialism
- intellectual lineage
- modern Japanese thought
- relational-processual sociology
- sociology of knowledge
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Meso-level processes of intellectual imperialism: the disruption of intellectual lineage formation in modern Japan and China by ‘juniority effects’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver