Abstract
The concept of meritocracy is unstable as its constituent ideas are potentially contradictory. The egalitarian aspects of meritocracy, for example, can come into conflict with its focus on talent allocation, competition, and reward. In practice, meritocracy is often transformed into an ideology of inequality and elitism. In Singapore, meritocracy has been the main ideological resource for justifying authoritarian government and its pro-capitalist orientations. Through competitive scholarships, stringent selection criteria for party candidacy, and high ministerial salaries, the ruling People's Action Party has been able to co-opt talent to form a “technocratic” government for an “administrative state.” However, as Singapore becomes more embedded in the processes of globalization, it will experience new forms of national crisis, alternative worldviews through global communications technology, and a widening income gap, all of which will force its ideology of meritocracy to unravel.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 7-27 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | International Political Science Review |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2008 |
User-Defined Keywords
- Elitism
- Global city
- Ideology
- Meritocracy
- Singapore