MEPs as Representatives: Individual and Institutional Roles

Roger Scully*, David M. Farrell*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    48 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Although the European Parliament (EP), as the sole directly-elected institution of the EU, has often been accorded prominence in discussions of 'democracy' and 'representation' within the Union, relatively little attention has been paid to the attitudes of EP members to the practice of representation in the EU. This article develops our understanding of MEPs' attitudes in two important areas. First, we examine how MEPs view their role as individual representatives, and their priorities within that role. Second, we explore parliamentarians' attitudes to their collective position within the EU by considering their opinions on the powers of the EP itself. Drawing on data from a recent survey of MEPs, we assess the extent to which their views on these questions are predicted by individual, institutional and political sources of explanation; our findings indicate that all three significantly, but far from exclusively, shape MEPs' views.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)269-288
    Number of pages20
    JournalJournal of Common Market Studies
    Volume41
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2003

    Scopus Subject Areas

    • Business and International Management
    • General Business,Management and Accounting
    • Economics and Econometrics
    • Political Science and International Relations

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'MEPs as Representatives: Individual and Institutional Roles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this