Measuring the mass-elite preference congruence: findings from a meta-analysis and introduction to the symposium

Jaemin SHIM*, Sergiu Gherghina

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

    16 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The extensive scholarship devoted to the congruence of mass-elite policy preferences lacks consensus about the meaning, comparison, and measurement across political settings. This makes comparisons difficult and raises obstacles to advancing the debates. This symposium aims to identify the diversity of methodological choices and to reflect systematically on several key choices of particular importance in understanding the congruence. The contributions to the symposium compare and contrast how several types of measurement fare in diverse political contexts in Eastern Europe, Latin America, North Africa, and East Asia, and what we can learn from those methodological choices.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)509-527
    Number of pages19
    JournalEuropean Political Science
    Volume19
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2020

    Scopus Subject Areas

    • Political Science and International Relations

    User-Defined Keywords

    • Issue congruence
    • Mass-elite
    • Measurement
    • Policy preferences
    • Representation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring the mass-elite preference congruence: findings from a meta-analysis and introduction to the symposium'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this