Measuring progress of smart cities: Indexing the smart city indices

Calvin Ming Tsun Lai*, Alistair Cole

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)
51 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The ‘smart city’ represents a core feature of modern urban development. The appearance of numerous smart city indices, which claim to successfully evaluate and compare smart city performances, is the manifestation of the concept's growing popularity. The central objective of this paper is to address the integrity and quality of the existing smart city indices, and identify those ones which are fit for international comparison. We propose a method for evaluating the integrity and quality of the existing smart city indices in terms of five criteria – Credibility, Reliability, Methodology, Versatility, Precision. The article critically evaluates six smart city indices and concludes that the Cities in Motion Index from the IESE Business School has the best overall performance. To improve the versatility of the existing smart city indices, this paper proposes a new approach based on respecting three main criteria: refining the types of indicator, defining the smart city domains and adopting context-sensitive measurements. These elements are deemed to be essential for any smart city index.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-57
Number of pages13
JournalUrban Governance
Volume3
Issue number1
Early online date26 Nov 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2023
EventTrust and the Smart City Final Project Conference - Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong
Duration: 29 Apr 202229 Apr 2022

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

User-Defined Keywords

  • Evaluation framework
  • Smart city concept
  • Smart city index
  • Urban development
  • Urban governance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring progress of smart cities: Indexing the smart city indices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this