Mao Qiling’s critical reflections on the four books

Lauren F PFISTER*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

After introducing some scholarship on the value of Mao Qiling’s (1623–1713) works, we present an account of canonization processes in order to understand the hermeneutic context of Mao’s battle with the Cheng-Zhu orthodoxy. His work is an attempt to decanonizing Zhu Xi’s Four Books, preferring instead an alternative relying on the Old Texts of the Taixue《太學》/Daxue《大學》 and Zhongyong 《中庸》. Mao argues against Zhu Xi’s textual changes and interpretations on a number of bases, producing a hermeneutics of suspicion against the Cheng-Zhu orthodoxy. Instead, Mao offers an alternative account of the sagely way, following precedents of Wang Yangming.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)323-339
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Chinese Philosophy
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mao Qiling’s critical reflections on the four books'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this