Mao Qiling's critical reflections on the Four Books

Lauren F. Pfister*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

    41 Downloads (Pure)


    After introducing some scholarship on the value of Mao Qiling’s (1623–1713) works, we present an account of canonization processes in order to understand the hermeneutic context of Mao’s battle with the Cheng-Zhu orthodoxy. His work is an attempt to decanonizing Zhu Xi’s Four Books, preferring instead an alternative relying on the Old Texts of the Taixue《太學》/Daxue《大學》 and Zhongyong 《中庸》. Mao argues against Zhu Xi’s textual changes and interpretations on a number of bases, producing a hermeneutics of suspicion against the Cheng-Zhu orthodoxy. Instead, Mao offers an alternative account of the sagely way, following precedents of Wang Yangming.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)323-339
    Number of pages17
    JournalJournal of Chinese Philosophy
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2013

    Scopus Subject Areas

    • Philosophy


    Dive into the research topics of 'Mao Qiling's critical reflections on the Four Books'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this