Maintenance Required: The Ethics of Geoengineering and Post-Implementation Scenarios

Pak Hang Wong*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)


The ethics of geoengineering has gained momentum in recent academic debate. The current debates, however, is typically framed in terms of (i) the first-order question about the moral permissibility of geoengineering, and (ii) the second-order question about the distributive and compensatory issues associated with geoengineering. Both (i) and (ii) are central to decision-making about geoengineering, but they have not cover all ethical issues related to geoengineering. I argue that a preoccupation with (i) and (ii) may lead to an oversight of post-implementation scenarios (PISs), which introduce different ethical issues relevant to decision-making on geoengineering. More specifically, I use the requirement of maintenance for geoengineering as an example to draw attention to PISs, and to illustrate the limit of the existing discussion in the ethics of geoengineering.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)186-191
Number of pages6
JournalEthics, Policy and Environment
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - May 2014

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Philosophy
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law


Dive into the research topics of 'Maintenance Required: The Ethics of Geoengineering and Post-Implementation Scenarios'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this