Lexical category differences in bilingual picture naming: Implications for models of lexical representation

Yasmeen Faroqi-Shah*, Yanni Kevas, Ran LI

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Bilingual speakers are less accurate and slower than monolinguals in word production. This bilingual cost has been demonstrated primarily for nouns. This study compared verb and noun retrieval to better understand bilingual lexical representation and test alternate hypotheses about bilingual cost. Picture naming speeds from highly proficient English–Spanish bilinguals showed a smaller bilingual cost for verbs compared to nouns. In Experiment 1, picture naming speeds were influenced by name agreement, age-of-acquisition and word length. Additionally, noun (but not verb) naming speed was predicted by word frequency. Experiment 2 examined two potential explanations for the smaller bilingual cost for verbs: verbs experience weaker cross-language interference (measured by translation speed) and smaller frequency effects. Both these predictions were confirmed, showing crucial differences between verbs and nouns and suggesting that cross-language facilitation rather than interference influences bilingual lexical retrieval, and that the frequency lag account of bilingual cost is more applicable to nouns than to verbs. We propose a Bilingual Integrated Grammatical Category model for highly proficient bilinguals to represent lexical category differences.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)841-863
    Number of pages23
    JournalBilingualism: Language and Cognition
    Volume24
    Issue number5
    Early online date6 May 2021
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2021

    User-Defined Keywords

    • bilingual
    • noun
    • picture naming
    • translation
    • verb

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Lexical category differences in bilingual picture naming: Implications for models of lexical representation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this