Left-frontal brain potentials index conceptual implicit memory for words initially viewed subliminally

Jason C.W. Chen, Wen Li, Ming Lui, Ken A. Paller

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Neural correlates of explicit and implicit memory tend to co-occur and are therefore difficult to measure independently, posing problems for understanding the unique nature of different types of memory processing. To circumvent this problem, we developed an experimental design wherein subjects acquired information from words presented in a subliminal manner, such that conscious remembering was minimized. Cross-modal word repetition was used so that perceptual implicit memory would also be limited. Healthy human subjects viewed subliminal words six times each and about 2 min later heard the same words interspersed with new words in a category-verification test. Electrophysiological correlates of word repetition included negative brain potentials over left-frontal locations beginning approximately 500 ms after word onset. Behavioral responses were slower for repeated words than for new words. Differential processing of word meaning in the absence of explicit memory was most likely responsible for differential electrical and behavioral responses to old versus new words. Moreover, these effects were distinct from neural correlates of explicit memory observed in prior experiments, and were observed here in two separate experiments, thus providing a foundation for further investigations of relationships and interactions between different types of memory engaged when words repeat.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)135-147
Number of pages13
JournalBrain Research
Volume1285
Early online date8 Jun 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Aug 2009

User-Defined Keywords

  • Explicit memory
  • Implicit memory
  • Conceptual implicit memory
  • Event-related potential

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Left-frontal brain potentials index conceptual implicit memory for words initially viewed subliminally'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this