TY - JOUR
T1 - Learning-based Artificial Intelligence Artwork
T2 - Methodology Taxonomy and Quality Evaluation
AU - Wang, Qian
AU - Dai, Hong Ning
AU - Yang, Jing Hua
AU - Guo, Cai
AU - Childs, Peter
AU - Kleinsmann, Maaike
AU - Guo, Yike
AU - Wang, Pan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Copyright held by the owner/author(s).
PY - 2024/11/11
Y1 - 2024/11/11
N2 - With the development of the theory and technology of computer science, machine or computer painting is increasingly being explored in the creation of art. Machine-made works are referred to as artificial intelligence (AI) artworks. Early methods of AI artwork generation have been classified as non-photorealistic rendering, and, latterly, neural style transfer methods have also been investigated. As technology advances, the variety of machine-generated artworks and the methods used to create them have proliferated. However, there is no unified and comprehensive system to classify and evaluate these works. To date, no work has generalized methods of creating AI artwork including learning-based methods for painting or drawing. Moreover, the taxonomy, evaluation, and development of AI artwork methods face many challenges. This article is motivated by these considerations. We first investigate current learning-based methods for making AI artworks and classify the methods according to art styles. Furthermore, we propose a consistent evaluation system for AI artworks and conduct a user study to evaluate the proposed system on different AI artworks. This evaluation system uses six criteria: beauty, color, texture, content detail, line, and style. The user study demonstrates that the six-dimensional evaluation index is effective for different types of AI artworks.
AB - With the development of the theory and technology of computer science, machine or computer painting is increasingly being explored in the creation of art. Machine-made works are referred to as artificial intelligence (AI) artworks. Early methods of AI artwork generation have been classified as non-photorealistic rendering, and, latterly, neural style transfer methods have also been investigated. As technology advances, the variety of machine-generated artworks and the methods used to create them have proliferated. However, there is no unified and comprehensive system to classify and evaluate these works. To date, no work has generalized methods of creating AI artwork including learning-based methods for painting or drawing. Moreover, the taxonomy, evaluation, and development of AI artwork methods face many challenges. This article is motivated by these considerations. We first investigate current learning-based methods for making AI artworks and classify the methods according to art styles. Furthermore, we propose a consistent evaluation system for AI artworks and conduct a user study to evaluate the proposed system on different AI artworks. This evaluation system uses six criteria: beauty, color, texture, content detail, line, and style. The user study demonstrates that the six-dimensional evaluation index is effective for different types of AI artworks.
KW - AI art
KW - artwork
KW - style transform
KW - painting
KW - methodology taxonomy
KW - quality evaluation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85211373305&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/3698105
DO - 10.1145/3698105
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85211373305
SN - 0360-0300
VL - 57
JO - ACM Computing Surveys
JF - ACM Computing Surveys
IS - 3
M1 - 71
ER -