TY - JOUR
T1 - Lanthanide-induced relaxation anisotropy
AU - Suturina, Elizaveta A.
AU - Mason, Kevin
AU - Geraldes, Carlos F.G.C.
AU - Chilton, Nicholas F.
AU - Parker, David
AU - Kuprov, Ilya
N1 - We thank the EPSRC for support (EP/N006909/1; EP/L01212X/1; EP/N006895/1). The authors acknowledge the use of the IRIDIS HPC Facility, and associated services at the University of Southampton. CFGCG was supported by a European Union COFUND/Durham University Senior Research Fellowship under EU grant agreement number 609412, hosted by Trevelyan College and Department of Chemistry. We thank Dr Nicola Rogers for assistance with the setup for the relaxation rate measurements at 1.0 Tesla. NFC thanks the Ramsay Memorial Trust for a Research Fellowship.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 the Owner Societies.
PY - 2018/7/14
Y1 - 2018/7/14
N2 - Lanthanide ions accelerate nuclear spin relaxation by two primary mechanisms: dipolar and Curie. Both are commonly assumed to depend on the length of the lanthanide-nucleus vector, but not on its direction. Here we show experimentally that this is wrong-careful proton relaxation data analysis in a series of isostructural lanthanide complexes (Ln = Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb) reveals angular dependence in both Curie and dipolar relaxation. The reasons are: (a) that magnetic susceptibility anisotropy can be of the same order of magnitude as the isotropic part (contradicting the unstated assumption in Guéron's theory of the Curie relaxation process), and (b) that zero-field splitting can be much stronger than the electron Zeeman interaction (Bloembergen's original theory of the lanthanide-induced dipolar relaxation process makes the opposite assumption). These factors go beyond the well researched cross-correlation effects; they alter the relaxation theory treatment and make strong angular dependencies appear in the nuclear spin relaxation rates. Those dependencies are impossible to ignore-this is now demonstrated both theoretically and experimentally, and suggests that a major revision is needed of the way lanthanide-induced relaxation data are used in structural biology.
AB - Lanthanide ions accelerate nuclear spin relaxation by two primary mechanisms: dipolar and Curie. Both are commonly assumed to depend on the length of the lanthanide-nucleus vector, but not on its direction. Here we show experimentally that this is wrong-careful proton relaxation data analysis in a series of isostructural lanthanide complexes (Ln = Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb) reveals angular dependence in both Curie and dipolar relaxation. The reasons are: (a) that magnetic susceptibility anisotropy can be of the same order of magnitude as the isotropic part (contradicting the unstated assumption in Guéron's theory of the Curie relaxation process), and (b) that zero-field splitting can be much stronger than the electron Zeeman interaction (Bloembergen's original theory of the lanthanide-induced dipolar relaxation process makes the opposite assumption). These factors go beyond the well researched cross-correlation effects; they alter the relaxation theory treatment and make strong angular dependencies appear in the nuclear spin relaxation rates. Those dependencies are impossible to ignore-this is now demonstrated both theoretically and experimentally, and suggests that a major revision is needed of the way lanthanide-induced relaxation data are used in structural biology.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049654198&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1039/c8cp01332b
DO - 10.1039/c8cp01332b
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 29932451
AN - SCOPUS:85049654198
SN - 1463-9076
VL - 20
SP - 17676
EP - 17686
JO - Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
JF - Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
IS - 26
ER -