Introduction: Resources for Political Reconciliation

C.K. Martin Chung, Annika Frieberg

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This introduction presents an overview of the key concepts discussed in the subsequent chapters of this book. The book focuses on peace and reconciliation studies through its conceptual focus on "resources". It explores such resources in terms of philosophical and religious traditions; narratives of reconciliation, forgiveness, and related concepts; memory cultures and shared identities; existing or emerging economic cooperation; and democratic institutions. The book also focuses on the cultural, political and historical obstacles to reconciliation. Obstacles might include (geo)political advantages to cultivating an atmosphere of antagonism, or fear towards a neighbouring country. The book addresses the question of resources and obstacles as such, whether these arise from various philosophical and religious traditions or are situated in related conceptual frameworks such as "processes" and "models". It explains original historical accounts and political analyses of reconciliation in particular post-colonial, post-communist, post-reunification and other "past-burdened" relationships. The book offers examples of how resources for reconciliation have functioned within specific politico-cultural or historical settings.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationReconciling with the Past
Subtitle of host publicationResources and Obstacles in a Global Perspective
EditorsAnnika Frieberg, C.K. Martin Chung
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge
Pages1-11
Number of pages11
Edition1st
ISBN (Electronic)9781315624631
ISBN (Print)9781138651722, 9781138367395
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Feb 2017

Publication series

NameRoutledge Advances in International Relations and Global Politics
PublisherRoutledge
Volume132

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Introduction: Resources for Political Reconciliation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this