Abstract
This longitudinal study (2001–09) of two Hong Kong secondary schools highlights six issues with an integrated arts curriculum: first, integration of knowledge and skills negatively precedes the integration of learners’ construction of meaning; second, integration is perceived as challenging the profession’s status; third, teachers are unaccustomed to co-teaching; fourth, teachers have little prior experience conceptualizing cross-discipline teaching and learning; fifth, Hong Kong’s current systemwide education reform places arts integration as a relatively low priority; and sixth, because integrated arts curriculum implementation is not mandatory, the vagaries of individual school management create a plethora of integration approaches that confound the task of forging a common definition. Remedial recommendations include cascading “seed projects” to broaden teachers’ views of integrated arts and teaching, facilitating supportive school timetabling, and sharing integrated learning outcomes in the individual schools.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 100-105 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Arts Education Policy Review |
| Volume | 113 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2012 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
User-Defined Keywords
- Education reform
- Hong kong
- Integrated arts curriculum
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Integrated arts curriculum in Hong Kong secondary schools'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver