Abstract
Previous diversification research has largely focused on product relatedness, but ignored institutional relatedness—the degree of informal embeddedness with the dominant institutions that confer resources and legitimacy. We argue that during institutional transitions, political ties and international experience represent different types of institutional relatedness linking firms, respectively, to political institutions and market institutions. Specifically, CEOs’ political ties may help firms access critical resources, sense new market entry opportunities, and gain board support to increase firms’ product diversification. CEOs’ international experience may help firms leverage different market-based capabilities, engage in international competition, and then lead firms to grow on a different path by expanding internationally. We further investigate a crucial contingency factor: the degree of economic freedom. Data from 11,992 firm-year observations based on firms listed on China’s stock exchanges between 2001 and 2011 largely support our predictions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 339-366 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | Asia Pacific Journal of Management |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
User-Defined Keywords
- Diversification
- Institutional relatedness
- Institutional transitions
- International experience
- Political ties
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Institutional relatedness behind product diversification and international diversification'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver