Abstract
This article elucidates the methodological issues around reanalysis, by comparing the treatment of a corpus of 52 interviews in two European regions by two researchers. The primary data were initially analysed by the principal investigator using a method similar to content analysis and with the help of NVivo 12. It was then reanalysed by a second researcher who did not participate in the interview campaign, using a more inductive method of qualitative discourse analysis assisted by Atlas-ti 8. The overarching conclusion confirms the usefulness of combining these methods of analysis. The article is a contribution to the literature on the use of CAQDAS in the context of the reuse of data.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 586-602 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Qualitative Research |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 20 Jul 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Aug 2021 |
Scopus Subject Areas
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
- History and Philosophy of Science
User-Defined Keywords
- Atlas-ti
- Brittany
- CAQDAS
- decentralisation
- devolution
- methodology
- NVivo
- reanalysis
- regions
- Wales