Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

(In)fertility and Loss: Conception and Motherhood in the Era of Assisted Reproductive Technology

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This chapter examines heterosexual and lesbian women's meaning-making processes and experiences of infertility and of assisted reproduction through a sociological lens. The intersectional approach to infertility provides a good vantage point for exploring the various ways in which class and sexuality reinforce and/or challenge biomedical and cultural notions of (in)fertility, conception, and parenthood. The chapter considers the sociological lens to explore the experiences of (in)fertility and assisted reproductive technology (ART), with a focus on women's sense of self and loss shaped by unfulfilled wishes for family formation or/and social expectations toward motherhood, on shifts in and constraints of family ideologies, and on the inequalities embedded in the medicalization of infertility. Amidst the global transformation of intimate and family lives, coupled with rapid development of, yet unequal access to, ART across the globe, individuals' self-definitions of their infertile identities are worth exploring.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHandbook of the Sociology of Death, Grief, and Bereavement
Subtitle of host publicationA Guide to Theory and Practice
EditorsNeil Thompson, Gerry R. Cox
PublisherRoutledge (Taylor & Francis Group)
Chapter21
Pages306-320
Number of pages15
Edition1st
ISBN (Electronic)9781315453859
ISBN (Print)9781138201071, 9781138201064
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Apr 2017

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '(In)fertility and Loss: Conception and Motherhood in the Era of Assisted Reproductive Technology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this