Abstract
Narrative practice (NP) is a psychotherapy approach that helps people
identify subordinated storylines and reimagine their lives. The concept
of intervention fidelity (IF) refers to the extent to which an
intervention is implemented as planned, and it is an essential component
in rigorous intervention research. However, it is challenging to assess
IF in NP, because NP cannot be simply seen as standardized procedures.
This study used the idea of scaffolding suggested in White (2007) to
analyze White's conversations and develop a method assessing whether his
conversations adhered to his stated principles. Results revealed
potential indicators, such as progression, synchrony, and proportion of
conversation utterances. These indicators are far from comprehensive and
they do not represent any absolute standards. Nonetheless, they open
the discussion about how we can rationalize intervention fidelity in NP.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 77-90 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Journal of Systemic Therapies |
Volume | 39 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2020 |
User-Defined Keywords
- narrative therapy
- narrative practice
- scaffolding
- treatment fidelity
- intervention fidelity