TY - JOUR
T1 - In Vivo delivery systems for therapeutic genome editing
AU - Wang, Luyao
AU - Li, Fangfei
AU - Dang, Lei
AU - Liang, Chao
AU - Wang, Chao
AU - He, Bing
AU - Liu, Jin
AU - Li, Defang
AU - Wu, Xiaohao
AU - Xu, Xuegong
AU - Lyu, Aiping
AU - Zhang, Ge
PY - 2016/4/27
Y1 - 2016/4/27
N2 - Therapeutic genome editing technology has been widely used as a powerful tool for directly correcting genetic mutations in target pathological tissues and cells to cure of diseases. The modification of specific genomic sequences can be achieved by utilizing programmable nucleases, such as Meganucleases, zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and the clustered regularly-interspaced short palindromic repeat-associated nuclease Cas9 (CRISPR/Cas9). However, given the properties, such as large size, negative charge, low membrane penetrating ability, as well as weak tolerance for serum, and low endosomal escape, of these nucleases genome editing cannot be successfully applied unless in vivo delivery of related programmable nucleases into target organisms or cells is achieved. Here, we look back at delivery strategies having been used in the in vivo delivery of three main genome editing nucleases, followed by methodologies currently undergoing testing in clinical trials, and potential delivery strategies provided by analyzing characteristics of nucleases and commonly used vectors.
AB - Therapeutic genome editing technology has been widely used as a powerful tool for directly correcting genetic mutations in target pathological tissues and cells to cure of diseases. The modification of specific genomic sequences can be achieved by utilizing programmable nucleases, such as Meganucleases, zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and the clustered regularly-interspaced short palindromic repeat-associated nuclease Cas9 (CRISPR/Cas9). However, given the properties, such as large size, negative charge, low membrane penetrating ability, as well as weak tolerance for serum, and low endosomal escape, of these nucleases genome editing cannot be successfully applied unless in vivo delivery of related programmable nucleases into target organisms or cells is achieved. Here, we look back at delivery strategies having been used in the in vivo delivery of three main genome editing nucleases, followed by methodologies currently undergoing testing in clinical trials, and potential delivery strategies provided by analyzing characteristics of nucleases and commonly used vectors.
KW - Genome editing
KW - In vivo delivery systems
KW - Programmable nucleases
KW - Vectors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84974622888&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/ijms17050626
DO - 10.3390/ijms17050626
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 27128905
AN - SCOPUS:84974622888
SN - 1661-6596
VL - 17
JO - International Journal of Molecular Sciences
JF - International Journal of Molecular Sciences
IS - 5
M1 - 626
ER -