Abstract
This study investigates how adding a saliently unattractive item to a blind-box series shapes consumers' purchasing decisions. Drawing on the reference-dependent framework of prospect theory and contextual evaluation theories, this research argues that an "ugly" outlier shifts consumers' operative reference point from securing a favorite to avoiding the worst when buying blind boxes. This reframing turns the purchase lottery into a high chance of an acceptable outcome. Three incentive-compatible behavioral experiments with Pop Mart collectibles and a purposive sample (n=80) of experienced or highly engaged consumers test this claim. Experiment 1 (single series) shows a higher purchase likelihood when an ugly item is present versus. absent. Experiment 2 (two series plus no-buy) increases overall purchase incidence and shifts demand toward the "clean" series. Experiment 3 (forced choice between series) reveals a preference for the clean series. The theoretical and managerial implications of this study are discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - 6 Nov 2025 |
| Event | 2025 Society for Marketing Advances Annual Conference, SMA 2025: All In on Experience: Betting on Consumer Insight and Engagement - Sahara Las Vegas, Las Vegas, United States Duration: 5 Nov 2025 → 8 Nov 2025 https://sma2025vegas.dryfta.com/ (Link to conference website) https://sma2025vegas.dryfta.com/81-program-schedule (Link to conference programme) |
Conference
| Conference | 2025 Society for Marketing Advances Annual Conference, SMA 2025 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | United States |
| City | Las Vegas |
| Period | 5/11/25 → 8/11/25 |
| Internet address |
|
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '"I Want the Prettiest" vs. "I Don't Want the Ugliest": Unpacking Consumers' Cognitive Paths in Blind Box Purchase Decision-Making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver