Hybridized discourse: Social openness and functions of English media in post–Mao China

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigates the real and potential functions of English media in the milieu of social openness in post–Mao China. The unique position of China’s English media reflects key characteristics of a ‘hybridized discourse’ and a style of reporting which seems both keen to control and eager to please. Three socio–political functions emerge from this mixed product. Consensual functions denote conformity to official ideology, with the media assuming the double role of political advocates and economic ‘boosters’. Conflictual functions, on the other hand, enable the media to promote cosmopolitan worldviews, pluralistic opinions, and occasionally alternative voices. Somewhere in the middle of the two opposing platforms are the Instrumental functions that emphasize media’s role as an information conduit, a language–learning tool, and a professional role model. This article examines the varying degrees to which China’s English media perform all three sets of functions, identifies conditions and timing for selective emphasis, and discusses the social and theoretical implications of studying the English media’s functions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)217-230
Number of pages14
JournalWorld Englishes
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2002

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Anthropology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hybridized discourse: Social openness and functions of English media in post–Mao China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this