Human rights in the neo-liberal imagination: Mapping the 'new sovereignties'

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

'The end of sovereignty': this has been an ominous refrain in the chorus of global political and human rights analyses aimed at reformulating a post-Cold War configuration of world power. In cultural studies, the same pronouncement is more likely made through a mix of theoretical exuberance and ambivalence toward a post-nationalist and cosmopolitan imaginary. This essay takes as a point of departure the rise of 'new sovereignties' - a fractured Westphalianism - as a rubric for understanding the political imagination about the international community today. It asks: to what dimensions of the regime of the new sovereignties can the human rights legal discourse as we know it today still exert influence, given the new configurations of globally disaggregated power? With human rights today reemerging as a bifurcation, how can cultural studies reconcile a theory of rights as subaltern claim-making with that of rights as an all-englobing tool in the neo-liberal order of world justice? Through a preliminary mapping of the moral-juridical and political forces that shape the regime of the new sovereignties, this essay attempts to illuminate why rights as international deontological politics is inadvertently complicit with the reproduction of rights as something constitutive of empire and neo-liberalism.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)417-436
Number of pages20
JournalCultural Studies
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • Anthropology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Social Sciences(all)

User-Defined Keywords

  • Global trade
  • Human rights
  • International law
  • Neo-liberalism
  • New sovereignties

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Human rights in the neo-liberal imagination: Mapping the 'new sovereignties''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this