Abstract
The growing visibility and aggressive tactics by some activist hedge funds raises the question of what determines whether these activist campaigns are successful. Given the lack of significant governmental oversight of hedge funds and their incentive structure, we propose that hubris is likely to play a role in explaining their success. Specifically we investigate and find that hedge funds that exhibit more hubris based on prior campaigns and their aggressiveness towards the target firm are less likely to be successful in achieving their stated goals. Our paper contributes to understanding activist hedge funds by examining how hubris may impact their success or failure.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Academy of Management Proceedings 2016 |
Editors | Sonia Taneja |
Publisher | Academy of Management |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2016 |
Event | 76th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2016: Making Organizations Meaningful - Anaheim, United States Duration: 5 Aug 2016 → 9 Aug 2016 https://aom.org/events/annual-meeting/past-annual-meetings/2016-making-organizations-meaningful (Conference website) https://journals.aom.org/toc/amproc/2016/1 (Conference proceedings) http://my.aom.org/ProgramDocs/2016/pdf/AOM_2016_Annual_Meeting_Program.pdf |
Publication series
Name | Academy of Management Proceedings |
---|---|
Number | 1 |
Volume | 2016 |
ISSN (Print) | 0065-0668 |
ISSN (Electronic) | 2151-6561 |
Conference
Conference | 76th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2016 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | United States |
City | Anaheim |
Period | 5/08/16 → 9/08/16 |
Internet address |
User-Defined Keywords
- Activist Investors
- Hedge Funds
- Hubris