How to be a Mereological Anti-Realist

Andrew T Brenner*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    Peter van Inwagen’s “special composition question” asks, more or less, “what must some objects be like in order for them to compose another object?” The chapter develops and defends (though falls short of fully endorsing) a theistic anti-realist response to the special composition question, according to which God decides when composition occurs. It is argued that this form of theistic mereological anti-realism is preferable to extant non-theistic variants of mereological anti-realism, and that theistic mereological anti-realism receives some motivation from several other sources (e.g., theistic mereological anti-realism provides some novel resources for responding to the problem of evil).
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationOxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion
    EditorsLara Buchak, Dean W. Zimmerman
    PublisherOxford University Press
    Pages83-119
    Number of pages37
    Volume10
    ISBN (Print)9780192862976
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2022

    User-Defined Keywords

    • composition
    • special composition question
    • anti-realism
    • theism
    • resurrection
    • problem of evil

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'How to be a Mereological Anti-Realist'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this